In Wakefield (2010) article, it was observed that the technological gap between developed countries and less-developed countries were getting bigger and affected the economy, education and income levels in the countries. Wi-Fi infrastructures were built to provide internet access to rural areas, where PCs were also made available to poorer citizens. It was believed that as long as internet access was made available, people would be keen to tap on the service.
Although it is undeniable that technology has aided people in the everyday lives, technology has also create many social problems that we are facing today. In this essay, I would talk about how the advantages of technology as stated in the article could bring about negative impacts to our everyday lives.
First and foremost, it is inevitable that technology has made our lives easier and more efficient. However, this could also mean that humans are getting over-reliant on technology and would potentially lose the ability to function without technology.
One example of which humans are over-dependent on technology is from Wakefield's article where a report author, Meinrath, had compared the use of technology and reading of books, where one who choose to remain offline is viewed as one who "pridefully claiming that you don't read books" (Wakefield, 2010)
According to an experiment done by Emily, Dean, Kenneth, Richard and Joan (2007), one of the results had revealed that clinicians were not able to perform without the use of technology. It was recorded that many medical students had never practice medicine without the aid of technology.
This evidence could mean that in the event that technology were to miraculously disappear in this world or that no power is available to run the computers, most of the medicine practitioner we have would lose the capability to treat the sick effectively.
Secondly, internet access enable us to be exposed to the different trends and issues around the world. However, this could also bring about negative effects to the society's perception of beauty, especially towards the younger girls.
One example of which internet access brought exposure to even the rural areas is from Wakefield's article where villagers made a movie about Roman culture and published it on YouTube. The number of views garnered most probably could have come from around the world.
According to Strickland (n.d.), media already posses a negative effect on individual self image. The media had provided a platform to showcase the unrealistic definition of beauty and body image, where viewers usually would believe them. However, they fail to realize that these unrealistic definition were all achieved by yet another form of technology, photo-editing.
Taking into consideration that the fastest way to transmit media is through the internet, it is evident that people who have the internet access would highly be able to access these media. As such, viewers especially teenagers would conform to believe and to take on extreme measures to look like those showcased models.
Lastly, technology has allow us to create many things, such as aeroplanes, trains and vehicles. However, this would also mean that humans are able to make use of technology to create weapons that could disrupt world peace.
In Wakefield (2010) article, it was mentioned that Sweden and Greece have differing education and income level. It was also stated that a comparison of such would bring about competency in the less-developed countries.
It is interesting to note that a Google search on 'Sweden weapons' and 'Greece weapons' generate two distinct variety of weapons. The 'Sweden weapons' Google returned with better equipped weapons as well as use of nuclear and chemical weapons. Conversely, 'Greece weapons' Google results returned with a wide variety of simple weapons like spheres and arrows. However, this Google results are not a substantiate reason to draw a conclusion.
I would like to draw to a point that, technology is definitely the main source of creating and improving different types of weapons. This continuous improvement and creation of weapons, such as the use of nuclear and chemicals, would bring about potential harm to individuals when accompanied with increasing wars.
In conclusion, amidst the fact that technology has brought about countless advantages to the world, it is asserted that there are numerous disadvantages building on them as well.
References
Wakefield, J. (19 March 2010). BBC News - World wakes up to digital divide. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8568681.stm
Emily M. Campbell, R.N., M.S. , Dean F. Sittig, Ph.D., and Joan S. Ash. (2007) Overdependence on Technology: An Unintended Adverse Consequence of Computerized Provider Order Entry. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2710605/
Strickland, J. (n.d.) Self Image Media Influences - Just Say Yes. Retrieved from http://justsayyes.org/topics/self-image-media-influences/
Hi Joan,
ReplyDeleteFirstly i like how you drew references from more than one source. Such references brings out your points clearly.
Secondly you have pulled the main ideas into three paragraphs which makes it easier for the reader to follow through.
I also find myself agreeing to majority of your arguments such as your first argument where we are over reliant on technology.
Generally it was a good read for me!
Cheers,
Pavithra
Hey Pavi!
DeleteThanks for reading and commenting! :D
I am glad to know that you agree with me!
Hi Joan!
ReplyDeleteHere's our comments regarding your reader response:
The numbers correspond to the worksheet under 'Content:'
2. "and affected the economy, education and income levels in the countries." doesn't seem to be true base on the "The scale of a country's digital divide reflects the condition of its economy, says ITU analyst Vanessa Gray." from the article.
3. Last sentence in summary should include an opposing view point which was stated in the article -->Sascha Meinrath's point of view.
4. Lacking key idea about not everyone knows/want to use Internet in summary.
14. We like the paragraph on perception of beauty as we found it relatable.
Digital divide is not defined. Although point 2 and 3 in your article is about digital divide, it seems not relevant to original article.
On the whole, it was a very interesting reader response!
Thank you :)
Joleen & Diyanah
Hey Joleen and Diyanah,
DeleteThank you so much for commenting on my first draft and spotting so many mistakes I have done! I took all of your suggestions to work on my 2nd draft! :D